FCA’s new prudential regime for MiFID firms will adversely impact over a thousand investment firms in the UK, a new poll suggests.
August 25, 2020 | AtoZ Markets – The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) proposed post-Brexit prudential regime for MiFID investment firms is set to negatively impact competitiveness, while impacting the attractiveness of the UK in the eyes of investment groups, according to research from Bovill.
Regulated firms have one month left to respond to the FCA’s consultation paper on the new rules.
How FCA’s prudential regime impacts UK investment firms
Bovill estimated that just over a third of the UK’s 3,844 MiFID investment firms are currently exempt from the EU’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment. The FCA is proposing to take a harder line with the new prudential regime, meaning all firms who were previously exempt will have to undergo an Internal Capital Adequacy and Risk Assessment (ICARA) for the first time, once the UK leaves the EU.
In Bovill’s study, 28% of firms said they would require extra resources, including people and systems, to meet the ICARA requirements.
Coming into effect in the summer of 2021, the FCA’s new Investment Firm Prudential Regime will replace the EU’s Investment Firms Directive and Investment Firms Regulation.
“This is a clear move by the FCA to gold-plate prudential regulations, and it seems unjustified and disproportionate for smaller investment firms,” Bovill managing consultant, Harpartap Singh, commented.
“Many of these firms will have never done this kind of assessment before, and so the administrative and resource burden will be a challenge. One of the key objectives of the new regime was to be risk-oriented and it doesn’t make sense in terms of risk to include smaller firms in the ICARA, when they are already covered by the FCA’s guidance on assessing adequate financial resources.
“The ICARA may be an onerous and rigorous process and the FCA didn’t give much warning. I think some smaller firms will struggle.”
Group capital requirements affect a large number of firms
The organizations polled by Bovill also indicated that one of the areas they were most concerned about was the new regime’s group capital requirements, with almost half of respondents (45%) saying they would be impacted.
“The group capital requirements affect a large number of firms and could make the UK a less attractive place for investment fund managers looking to set up or expand,” Singh added. “This combined with ICARA and the more stringent rules around holding capital could put UK firms at a disadvantage on the global stage, at a time where we arguably need to be at our most competitive.”
Think we missed something? Let us know in the comment section below.